MyFox
 

bubbah's Blog

by bubbah from Your subconscious

Last Post 1 day, 19 hours Ago


The multiple shootings this week, were the shooters living in section 8 homes?

 Were they voucher holders?

Were they recieving any government assistance?
Are we going to keep paying them to shoot up Memphis?
16 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 16
Page 1 of 1
mskaytenn read my blog
Jul 31, 2008 | 9:19 AM

What does living in Secion 8 homes or receiving government assistance have to do with them shooting?

ExPatNortherner read my blog
Jul 31, 2008 | 10:07 AM

Where are you going with this Bubbah?

Ex-Pat

cloudman read my blog
Jul 31, 2008 | 5:16 PM

Where he is going with this is easy. Working class people have better things to do than murder each other.
They are busy trying to make ends meet the only way they know how. By working harder and saving money anyway they can.

sassysinglemom0197 read my blog
Jul 31, 2008 | 5:46 PM

Cloudman and Bubbah everybody that is on Section 8 and receiving vouchers is not a murderer or thief. When I became pregnant with my son I was in school at Memphis State and Working as a Certified Pharmacy Tech. I received food stamps and tenncare and was going to get section 8 until my mom told me to come home. A lot of people are on Section 8 because they've hit hard times. Oh yeah and I received WIC vouchers too. Just my two cents

ExPatNortherner read my blog
Jul 31, 2008 | 5:59 PM

"Where he is going with this is easy. Working class people have better things to do than murder each other."

I was afraid someone was going to go there with this. Blanket blaming the poor, while giving the middle class a pass is the height of elitism (among other obvious errors of judgement, but I won't go there).

Ex-Pat

bubbah read my blog
Jul 31, 2008 | 6:45 PM

Well, that's NOT where I was going with it.
Where I was going with it, other than (quick! duck from impending personal responsibility of making your own asumptions approaching!) where you took it, was:
The administration of the program should be WAYYY more proactive about the background checks,there should be retroactive background checks to clean up the program. They ARE in order!
I have had public assistance too including WIC when my kids fell ill. I know not everyone is bad, BUT, when the GOV doesn't hold up it's end to faithfuly administrate BY THE RULES that the fed set up, then it is guilty of "stacking it's own deck" as far as artificially creating or cultivating artificially high rolls of unqualified voucher holders, i.e. criminals, to get more federal money to subvert to their pockets. There has been a parallell drawn by Dr. Janikowski, but, absent police reports to correlate there can't be a direct connection made, even though there absolutely is one. Ask anyone in a declining neighborhood in Memphis.

There should be a LOT MORE TRANSPARENCY brought on by exposing the connection if a felon or violent offender is a voucher holder, or, is living in subsidized housing, or acepting any assistance if only to get the CITY to STOP WASTING MONEY that would be BETTER SPENT somewhere else, like on qualified voucher holders and police, and to know for real whether it is helping or hurting us as a whole, and who it is doing what to.

Sassy, when you got off assistance, do you remember how wide the gap was from "elligable to keep receiving" to "making enough mone

bubbah read my blog
Jul 31, 2008 | 6:45 PM

"making enough money to get off it" was?
I sure do and it was BIG.
I don't know how anyone can afford to get off of it WITHOUT BREAKING THE LAW. I had to STARVE and not buy any new clothes for four years to get off it.
What a position to be forced into!

bubbah read my blog
Jul 31, 2008 | 6:54 PM

So, to be clear:
In my neighborhood, you could follow a trail of litter from the convenience store and drug and prostitution houses to section 8 houses, everytime. I'm sure there are good people on it, but, they don't leave a trail of litter, dead bodies, injured people or killed children behind them.
Those folks don't need their bills payed for them. The rules say we aren't supposed to be funding criminals.
But we are.

bubbah read my blog
Jul 31, 2008 | 7:00 PM

My neighborhood asoc found out by accident when we got tired of this one house full of knuckleheads causing a LOT of problems and fights. We looked into it and they were section 8 tenants, then we looked at the other houses that were causing "trouble" (gunshots all day everyday, drugs, teen prostitutes, gangs, assaults, robberies, burglaries, crack dealing and using children as mules for drug dealers and gangs), and they were section 8 tenants, then we expanded the search for one square mile, and all of them were section 8 tenants.
FYI

ReclusiveGrub
Aug 1, 2008 | 2:08 AM

bubbah just because you had trouble with one family who happened to be getting Section 8 assistance doesn't mean that all of them are bad people.

That is like saying all of a certain group is bad because one did something wrong.

bubbah read my blog
Aug 1, 2008 | 8:34 AM

It wasn't one family,
it was an entire neighborhood,
full of section 8 houses,
an entire neighborhood.
Well, really it was two or three adjacent neighborhoods we looked at.
I never made the assumption that all section 8 was bad, just the lax administration causing blight by using it to fill the coffers, again.
Now, you tell me, were the shooters on section 8?
It isn't about the criminals, it's about the administration.
You should have read this without making assumptions that I did not illustrate.

irishoaks read my blog view my photos
Aug 2, 2008 | 10:36 PM

Be aware, and alert. bubbah does not just blow off steam for the sake of hearing his own voice. he doesn't lump folk in a bag and tie them up together to make a stat work.

The_Okay_Pro_Se read my blog view my photos
Aug 4, 2008 | 10:57 AM

people from all walks of life kill. where was this going.... sterotype

bubbah read my blog
Sep 9, 2008 | 1:08 PM

Exactly what stereotype?

No it was ALL EVIDENCE based. EVIDENCE precludes a stereotype.
Not stereotyping, unless you call lax administration of federal funded programs to subvert funds and artificially inflate numbers of eligible candidates for housing costing the truly eligible availability of housing funds and in the process destroying neighborhoods to make cheap property available for political cronies a stereotype.

mommyof06 read my blog view my photos
Sep 10, 2008 | 9:55 PM

The police officer that killed his mistress as'nt on section 8 or th ons in the past who have committed crimes. Nor where the political officails,etc. But when a crime happens in a certain community we allways are so vry quick to have a comment about the less fortunate. Why dont you look at the staistics for crime inside our goverment and post that.

bubbah read my blog
Sep 22, 2008 | 12:46 PM

Those would be hidden from you and me. Mainly because they don't usually get caught and the investigations just keep on going and going till no one remembers.
We have done a post on it before but it was a long time ago when Tenn Waltz was ongoing.
Good Idea to do another.
We could also look to see if the officers came from section 8 households.
I'm not saying section 8 recipients are bad, I'm saying the admnistration of the program is being used to house criminals on purpose and put them in areas that the corrupt officials want cheapened so that they can purchase large blocks of land via their chronies for next to nothing and sell them to national store chains and pocket your money.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




bubbah

The all seeing eye! We are watching you. I'm on a mission from God. Don't like it? Tough luck!

Member Since: 7/5/2007